Legal Opinion

The Convoy

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 25, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel by the Interstate Lighterage & Transportation •Company against the steam tug Convoy.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The claimant has excepted to the libel upon the ground that a lien does not accrue, and that an action in rem may not be had, upon a claim for “work, labor, and services *844performed at the special instance and request of the owner,” when set forth as in this libel.

The libel alleges that in the month of January, 1918, the libelant, at the special instance and request of the owners of said steam tug, performed certain work, labor, and services in raising said steam tug Convoy at the foot of Eighteenth street, Hoboken, N. J., where said tug was lying in a sunken and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The CamancheSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The OceanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. The HatterasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. The J. DohertyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  5. The Dredge A.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The HallDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1931
  2. Interstate Lighterage & Transportation Co. v. Newtown Creek Towing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1920
  3. Steadt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. PNC Bank, Delaware v. F/V Miss LauraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API