Legal Opinion
Steadt v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 21, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Respondent excepts to the libel on two grounds: “1. The libel does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. 2. • The libel fails to identify any specific vessel alleged to have been owned by the respondent and to have collided with the libelant’s barge.”
Libelants cross-move “for an order herein striking Respondent’s Exceptions as not being timely made in accordance with the local Admiralty Rules of this Court and for an order granting judgment by default in favor of Libelants for the failure of Respondent to timely appear and answer.”
It is necessary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- British Transport Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hammond-Knowlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weiss v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Wall Street Traders, Inc. v. Sociedad Espanola de Construccion NavalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964