Legal Opinion

The Dredge A.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1914No. Nos. 44-53PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Howard S. Roberts and others against the Dredge A and Edmund H. Mitchell, trading as Mitchell & Co., owner.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

Steam Dredge A, which constitutes the subject-matter of this controversy, after being constructed at Philadelphia, Pa., in the manner and under the conditions found by the special master, as hereinafter set forth, was brought to Beaufort, N. C., where it was to be operated in dredging the navigable waters in and around the ports of Oriental, Morehead City, and Beaufort, N. C., upon a government contract which had been secured by the said Edmund PI. Mitchell, trading as Mitchell & Co. After being operated several months in the performance of the work for which he had…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Edwards v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. People's Ferry Company of Boston v. BeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Butler v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. E.S. Binnings, Inc. v. M/V Saudi RiyadhCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. The NisseqogueDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1922
  5. Goumas v. K. Karras & SonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API