Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Appert
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1990No. CX-90-1187PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Janice Cohen brought this fraud, legal malpractice, and breach of fiduciary duty action against Robert J. Appert, an attorney who represented Cohen in the settlement of her claims against A.H. Robins Co. The trial court denied Appert’s motion for summary judgment and we affirm.
FACTS
Janice Cohen had a Daikon Shield, an intrauterine contraceptive device manufactured and sold by A.H. Robins Company, inserted by Dr. Arthur Horowitz in February of 1972. While wearing the Daikon Shield, she experienced pain in walking, physical exertion, and sexual intercourse. The device was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- TCF National Bank v. Market Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Janice S. Hope v. Mirek KlabalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Thunanber v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.