Legal Opinion

Paoli v. Dave Hall, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 11, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

Cross-motions for summary judgment have been advanced by defendant Dave Hall, Inc. (“Hall”) and defendants Donald F. Deaven, Inc. (“Deaven”) and William C. Zern (“Zern”). The issues upon which the parties seek summary adjudication 1 concern 1) whether Zern, a crane operator in the service of equipment owner Deaven and leased by him to general contractor Hall to operate said crane, was, in fact, a “loaned employee” of the latter during the incident giving rise to this lawsuit, and 2) whether Deaven and Zern are entitled to indemnity from Hall in the event liability for negligence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  2. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. United States v. TuteurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. State v. Interstate Amiesite CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Richardson v. John T. Hardy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
  2. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Lexington Insurance v. RaboinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. DRR, L.L.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
  5. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API