Legal Opinion

Lexington Insurance v. Raboin

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 9, 1998No. 95C-04-195 SCDPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Del PESCO, Judge.

Introduction

The issue before the Court concerns whether, pursuant to the terms of a lease agreement, a residential ténant is a “co-insured” under the landlord’s general fire insurance policy for the limited purpose of shielding the tenant from a subrogation action by the landlord’s carrier in an instance where the tenant’s alleged negligent conduct caused a fire loss.' I conclude that for purposes of preventing subrogation landlords and. residential tenants are co-insureds, absent some clearly expressed intent in the lease to the contrary.

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Rock Springs Realty, Inc. v. WaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Dattel Family Ltd. Partnership v. WintzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API