Lexington Insurance v. Raboin
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Del PESCO, Judge.
Introduction
The issue before the Court concerns whether, pursuant to the terms of a lease agreement, a residential ténant is a “co-insured” under the landlord’s general fire insurance policy for the limited purpose of shielding the tenant from a subrogation action by the landlord’s carrier in an instance where the tenant’s alleged negligent conduct caused a fire loss.' I conclude that for purposes of preventing subrogation landlords and. residential tenants are co-insureds, absent some clearly expressed intent in the lease to the contrary.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Rock Springs Realty, Inc. v. WaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Dattel Family Ltd. Partnership v. WintzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.