Legal Opinion

DRR, L.L.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 17, 1996No. Civil Action 94-401 MMSPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff DRR, L.L.C., (“DRR”), a Delaware corporation, has filed suit against defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”), a New York corporation, for claims arising out of its purchase of certain real property in Wilmington, Delaware. Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1 at ¶2 of Complaint. Pursuant to a 1992 purchase and sale agreement, Ralph and Rosalind Paul (“the Pauls” or “Paul”) bought property from Sears. Id. at ¶ 3. The Pauls later assigned their interest to DRR. Id. at ¶4. Following settlement, DRR began to redevelop the property. Id.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. Keywell Corporation v. Daniel C. Weinstein and Anthony BoscarinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  3. Mbia Insurance Corporation Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee of Sfc Grantor Trust, Series 2000-1, Sfc Grantor Trust, SeriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. Metro Communication Corp. v. Advanced Mobilecomm Technologies Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API