Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Gitlitz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,103PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

On January 30, 1936, plaintiff recovered a judgment by confession in the sum of $823.51. The judgment was based upon two bonds signed by defendants. The latter, in apt time, filed a motion to vacate the judgment, or in the alternative that the court satisfy of record the judgment, and a verified petition in support of the motion. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike defendants’ amended petition from the files. The court entered an order “overruling motion of defendants to vacate the judgment” and sustaining plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ petition from the files. Defendants appeal.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harding v. HawkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of Shattuck Ex Rel. VersluisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Mazur v. SteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Messick v. MohrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Interstate Bank of Oak Forest v. SluisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Osborn v. ThorpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API