Legal Opinion

Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 15, 1934No. Gen. No. 37,163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiff brought suit on four bonds secured by a trust deed, and upon trial by court had judgment for $2,090, from which defendant appeals.

The bonds contained language referring to the trust deed and the question presented is whether this language, in connection with certain limitations expressed in the trust deed, bars plaintiff from pursuing an action at law on the bonds. This language in the bonds is as follows:

“Said trust deed and this bond, as well as all the other bonds aforesaid, are to be taken and considered together as parts of one and the same contract.
“Both principal and interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Pelueger v. Broadway Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Boley v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Barnett v. GitlitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. BairstowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API