In re Proceedings to Disbar Bevans
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In brief, the charges presented against respondent are: That he made, published and circulated false, vicious and libelous charges against two justices of the Supreme Court; that these acts were malicious; and that they constituted professional misconduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and make manifest the unfitness of the respondent to act as an officer of the court in the capacity of attorney and counselor at law.
The particular charge as limited by this court (See 222 App. Div. 701) arose in an action brought in January, 1925, by the respondent as attorney in person against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- In re MainsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Cobb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- In re ManhiemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Paul G. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- In re HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DeMaioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In re ChiofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re WisehartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.