In re Wisehart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Arthur M. Wisehart was admitted to practice in *24the State of New York in 1955 and has maintained a law office in the First Judicial Department at all times relevant to these charges.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order confirming the Hearing Panel report that sustained, partially or fully, four of eight charges of misconduct brought against respondent and recommended a suspension of no less than three months. Respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report insofar as it partially sustained Counts One and Two and fully sustained Counts Four and…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lipin v. BenderNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re DinhoferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lipin v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re GolubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- In Re ComfortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- In re AbadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lipin v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF PITTSBURGHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re ChiofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re CaliguiriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.