In re Manhiem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Application to the court on charges of professional misconduct.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
T-he respondent, ah attorney and counselor at law, was counsel in a case in the City Oonrt of New York. That case came on for trial before one of the justices of that court,, and resulted in the defeat of' the respondent’s client. Subsequently the respondent wrote a letter to the justice complaining of his conduct, and containing reflections upon the integrity of the justice and, by inference, of other members of the court. The justices of the court served a notice upon the respondent to appear before them and explain- his conduct. He offered to them no explanation, but…
2Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Paul G. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- State Board of Law Examiners v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- In re Proceedings to Disbar BevansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.