Legal Opinion

Prybolsky v. Prybolsky

Delaware Family Court

Decided April 13, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Judge.

Before the court is respondent’s motion challenging the court’s jurisdiction over his person, asking that the purported service of process be quashed because he is a non-resident of the State of Delaware and (1) the purported service upon him by registered mail was ineffectual because Family Court Rule 110(c) requires personal service of initial process, and (2) the purported service pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 3104 (the long-arm statute), was ineffectual because the statute is inapplicable to a support proceeding.

1

The parties are husband and wife and lived together as such with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Egbert v. EgbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. McCoy v. HickmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
  4. Lea v. LeaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Rosemary K. v. Kevin DcDelaware Family Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lozinski v. LozinskiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Helen B.M. v. Samuel F.D.Delaware Family Court · 1984
  3. Fielder v. ThornDelaware Family Court · 1987
  4. T.L. v. W.L.Delaware Family Court · 2003
  5. King v. KingDelaware Family Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API