Legal Opinion

Helen B.M. v. Samuel F.D.

Delaware Family Court

Decided April 26, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Judge.

This is a decision on respondent father’s motion to dismiss a petition for support of his allegedly dependent adult son, Pete, brought by Pete’s mother, individually and as his next of friend, in order to establish respondent’s support obligation to pay 50% of Pete’s extraordinary medical expenses and living costs which petitioner is now providing in full.

Petitioner and respondent were divorced in 1962. Petitioner has lived in Pennsylvania since 1978 and respondent in Maryland for the last 20 years. Pete is 31 years old and lives in Pennsylvania where he is currently undergoing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kruvant v. KruvantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Fox v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Prybolsky v. PrybolskyDelaware Family Court · 1981
  5. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dalton v. ClantonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Fielder v. ThornDelaware Family Court · 1987
  3. King v. KingDelaware Family Court · 1985
  4. Lewkowitz v. LewkowitzDelaware Family Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API