Legal Opinion
Lea v. Lea
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 7, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 333 (1954)
108 A.2d 303
NAOMI RUTH LEA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT M. LEA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 23, 1954.
Decided October 7, 1954.
Before Judges DAVIDSON, HUGHES and PINDAR.
Mr. C. Zachary Seltzer argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Anthony Mitchell, attorney).
Mr. Morton C. Steinberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PINDAR, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
Two questions are presented on this appeal: (1) The propriety of the entry of a judgment for accumulated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Lamanna's EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Egbert v. EgbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Prybolsky v. PrybolskyDelaware Family Court · 1981
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Liberty Temple Universal Church of Christ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Lipman v. Rutgers-State Univ. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000