Legal Opinion
King v. King
Delaware Family Court
Decided July 22, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAKEFIELD, Judge.
On August 29, 1984, Petitioner (herein sometimes “mother”) filed a Civil Support Petition on a Family Court form seeking $260 per week for the support of two children of her marriage to Respondent (herein sometimes “father”). Service by summons was made on the father in the State of Maine pursuant to Delaware’s Long-Arm Statute, 10 Del.C. § 3104, 1 and also by ordinary mail, 10 Del. C. § 974.
On September 11, 1984, respondent wrote to the Clerk of Court acknowledging receipt of the summons. He also contacted an attorney in Maine who also wrote to the Clerk asking that notice…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Solis v. TeaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eudaily v. Harmon Ex Rel. HarmonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fielder v. ThornDelaware Family Court · 1987
- In Re Estate of GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987