Legal Opinion

Skalecki v. Frederick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Because this appeal comes before us without a transcript of the reporter’s notes, the scope of our review must be confined to the record before us. We cannot review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact. Our consideration is limited to the question of whether the pleadings and the findings of fact support the j udgment. 2

Briefly stated, the plaintiff gave his own check made payable to the garnishee defendant with the understanding that the proceeds would be paid to the principal defendant, and before the check was endorsed or cashed commenced the garnishment action…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stelloh v. LibanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. La Crosse National Bank v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Fishburn v. LondershausenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. William Frankfurth Hardware Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gray v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Water Processing Co. v. Southern Golf Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Milwaukee Stove & Furnace Supply Co. v. Apex Heating & Cooling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Moskowitz v. MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Opinion No. Oag 3-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API