Legal Opinion

Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. William Frankfurth Hardware Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The trial court held in its written opinion, and the defendant now contends, that the plaintiff can only recover damages where its cause of action is based upon malicious prosecution, and second, that under the provisions of sec. 2771 of the Statutes the plaintiff cpuld have filed a bond in the civil court proceedings and obtained possession of the property, and thereby have prevented any damages from accruing.

The remedy afforded by garnishment is purely statutory, *24and though in its nature a proceeding in rem it is in effect an action by the defendant in the plaintiff’s name against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morawetz v. Sun Insurance OfficeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gilman v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  3. McIntosh v. KnoxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Power v. KindschiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. First State Bank of Pond Creek v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. National Motor Service Co. v. WaltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Global Steel Products Corp. v. Ecklund Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Mahrle v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API