Legal Opinion

Stelloh v. Liban

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1963PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The appeal comes before us without a bill of exceptions. Without a bill of exceptions, which is now designated a transcript of the reporter’s notes by the new rules of this court, sec. 251.25, Stats., the scope of our review is necessarily confined to the record before us. Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1961), 13 Wis. (2d) 491, 109 N. W. (2d) 131. Obviously, if no testimony is preserved on appeal, this court is powerless to review a question of fact dependent upon it or to determine the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict or the findings. In such cases we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. McMurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. David K. Guenther v. Mark Holmgreen and City of Black River FallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Peters v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Austin v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. OutlawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API