Legal Opinion
In Re: Cardizem Cd Antitrust Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2004No. 03-2514PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
391 F.3d 812
In re: CARDIZEM CD ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
Eugenia Wynne Sams, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hoechst AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees,
Fifty States; District of Columbia and Puerto Rico; State Law Plaintiffs, Appellees.
No. 03-2514.
No. 03-2635.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: September 15, 2004.
Decided and Filed: December 14, 2004.
Gordon Ball, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant.
Paul F. Novak, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, Robert L. Hubbard, Director of Litigation, Antitrust Bureau,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re: Cardizem Cd Antitrust Litigation. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., and Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Marie O. Pedraza v. United Guaranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- Azizian v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Cardizem Cd Antitrust Litigation. Eugenia Wynne Sams, Plaintif-Appellant, Gordon Ball, Attorney-Appellant v. State Attorneys General State Law State of Tennessee, Hoechst AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Jim Sciaroni v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.