Legal Opinion
Jim Sciaroni v. Target Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 1, 2017No. 15-3909, 15-3912, 16-1203, 16-1245, 16-1408PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal from various district court orders in a lengthy and multifarious class action lawsuit against Target Corporation. Class member Leif Olson challenges the class certification for lack of adequate representation due to an alleged intraclass conflict. Class member Jim Sciaroni does not object to the certification but appeals the district court’s approval of the settlement agreement. Together, Olson and Sciaroni also challenge the district court’s order requiring them to post a bond of $49,156 to cover the costs of this appeal. For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alexia Keil v. Paul LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Jim Sciaroni v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Custom Hair Designs by Sandy v. Central Payment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Jim Sciaroni v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Debra Darrington, as next friend for M.R., et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Missouri Department of Mental Health, et al.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.