Legal Opinion
Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2013No. 12-60385, 12-60586PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:
These appeals arise out of the district court’s resolution of matters concerning an invocation of Mississippi’s “Stop Notice” statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (“Stop Notice statute”), by King Construction of Houston. The State of Mississippi (“the State”) challenges the district court’s determination that Mississippi’s Stop Notice statute is facially unconstitutional. We AFFIRM. We DENY King’s motion to dismiss its appeal.
In a separate appeal, No. 12-60586, Noatex challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for further relief and stay of an appeal bond…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kohn Law Group, Inc. v. Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Leroy Mack v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Ramon Alvarado v. Corporate Cleaning Services, ICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Tennille v. Western Union (Nelson)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.