Legal Opinion
Economu v. Borg-Warner Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 6, 1986No. Civ. H-84-1320(AHN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEVAS, District Judge.
This action arises out of the plaintiffs employment relationship with Burns International Security Services, Inc., (“Burns”) a subsidiary of the defendant Borg-Warner Corporation. At issue in these cross motions for summary judgment 1 is the plaintiffs entitlement to pension benefits. Both the plaintiff and the defendant agree that there , are no material facts in dispute and that resolution in accordance with Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. is appropriate.
The plaintiffs employment with Burns began on May 3, 1976. At that time, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Harold Miles v. The New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement Fund Employee Pension Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Titsch v. Reliance Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Swaida v. IBM Retirement PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Gurnack v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Gandelman v. Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Andrews v. Jones Truck LinesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Economu v. Borg-Warner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.