Legal Opinion
Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 24, 1983No. 82 Civ. 3571PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This action was commenced by plaintiff, 1 Paul P. Swaida, Jr., a former employee of International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against IBM’s directors, its retirement plan (the “Plan”), the Retirement Plan Committee and others who play a role in the administration and enforcement of the Plan (collectively “the defendants”). Plaintiff seeks a judgment (1) declaring that IBM’s use of the “elapsed time method” for computing service for vesting credit under the Plan violates the vesting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rose v. Long Island Railroad Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Clifford C. Coleman v. Interco Incorporated Divisions' PlansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.