Legal Opinion
Gandelman v. Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1999No. 3:97CV0212(GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, David P. Gandelman, has filed a three-count complaint against his former employer, Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc., (“AASI”), and two of its officers and di-, rectors, alleging that they violated section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140, by terminating him in order to remove him from coverage under AASI’s group health insurance plans. (Pl.’s Compl. at ¶ 19). Plaintiff has also asserted state-law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful discharge. Defendants now move…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ridge v. Cape Elizabeth School DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Peter Martin v. Google LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026