Legal Opinion

Smoky Mountain Canteen Co. v. Kizer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1952PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The question for our decision in this case is whether or not the appellant is liable for Sales Tax as applied by Chapter 3 of the Public Acts of 1947, 1932 Code Supplement, 1328.22-1328.39, Retailers Sales Tax Statute.

The suit was brought by the appellant for refund of Sales Taxes paid by it under protest. The Chancellor held the tax legally collected and dismissed the bill. As a result this appeal has been duly perfected, briefs filed and argument heard.

The appellant is a Tennessee corporation engaged in the automatic vending machine business. It operates candy, soft drink, chewing gum and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Winslow-Spacarb, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hooten v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Nashville Tobacco Works v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Shainberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. White v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. First Agricultural National Bank of Berkshire County v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API