Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Crocker National Bank
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 2, 1983No. C-82-4178 RPAPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AGUILAR, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on motions for partial summary judgment brought by both parties.
Background
Plaintiffs, Valdean Mahoney and Philip S. Culcasi, brought this action on behalf of themselves and a class of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief on account of defendant Crocker National Bank’s alleged acts of age discrimination.
Named plaintiffs claim that each were discharged from their positions with Crock-er solely on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hentzel v. Singer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Kinney Shoe Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Bob W. Vorhes and John A. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Allen v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.