Fifth Third Bank v. Baumhaft (In Re Baumhaft)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this nondischargeability action under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2), (4) and (6), the plaintiff has moved for summary judgment. Because the debtor’s pre-bankruptcy admissions and stipulations of fact are binding in this proceeding and justify a judgment of nondischargeability, the motion is granted.
I
On or about February 2, 1999, Michael Baumhaft pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Baumhaft entered into a Rule 11 plea agreement in which he stipulated to the elements of bank fraud pursuant to § 1344.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Dennis Amiel Calvert, Debtor. Bay Area Factors, a Division of Dimmitt & Owens Financial, Inc. v. Dennis Amiel CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WesterfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Northwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010
- Carmona v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010