Legal Opinion

Fifth Third Bank v. Baumhaft (In Re Baumhaft)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 15, 2001No. 19-41101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this nondischargeability action under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2), (4) and (6), the plaintiff has moved for summary judgment. Because the debtor’s pre-bankruptcy admissions and stipulations of fact are binding in this proceeding and justify a judgment of nondischargeability, the motion is granted.

I

On or about February 2, 1999, Michael Baumhaft pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Baumhaft entered into a Rule 11 plea agreement in which he stipulated to the elements of bank fraud pursuant to § 1344.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. In Re Dennis Amiel Calvert, Debtor. Bay Area Factors, a Division of Dimmitt & Owens Financial, Inc. v. Dennis Amiel CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WesterfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  2. Northwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Carmona v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API