Austin v. Royal League
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
Arthur Brookover in his lifetime was a member of plaintiff in error, the Royal League, a fraternal beneficiary society organized under the laws of Illinois. The beneficiary named in the certificate when it was issued was Sarah Brook-over, wife of Arthur and mother of defendant in error, Merritt B. Austin. Upon the death of Sarah, in 1907, a new certificate was issued naming defendant in error, the step-son of the insured, as beneficiary by describing him as a dependent. In 1911 Brookover became physically unable to continue his business, and thereupon defendant in error at his request paid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- National Union v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Washington Life Insurance v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Mosier v. OsbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Klein v. La Salle National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Griffin v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.