Legal Opinion

Austin v. Royal League

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 16122. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Arthur Brookover in his lifetime was a member of plaintiff in error, the Royal League, a fraternal beneficiary society organized under the laws of Illinois. The beneficiary named in the certificate when it was issued was Sarah Brook-over, wife of Arthur and mother of defendant in error, Merritt B. Austin. Upon the death of Sarah, in 1907, a new certificate was issued naming defendant in error, the step-son of the insured, as beneficiary by describing him as a dependent. In 1911 Brookover became physically unable to continue his business, and thereupon defendant in error at his request paid…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. National Union v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Washington Life Insurance v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Mosier v. OsbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Klein v. La Salle National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Griffin v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API