Legal Opinion

ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2010No. 107954PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The question at issue here is whether a mortgagee must name a personal representative for a deceased mortgagor in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding in order for the circuit court to acquire subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it must.

Background

This appeal involves two cases, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. McGahan and Charter One Bank v. Hunter. The facts of each are set forth below.

ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. McGahan

In…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bickerdike v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Waughop v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pfaff v. Chrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. D'Attomo v. BaumbeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. First Midwest Bank v. CoboIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  4. In re Whitlock-YoungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Estate of SchoenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API