Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 26, 2019No. 2:19-cv-11410Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDRE L. CLARK, Case No. 19-cv-11410 Plaintiff, Paul D, Borman Vv. United States District Judge FORD MOTOR COMPANY and FORD MOTOR COMPANY GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendants. notte ee OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV, P. 12(b)(6) (ECF NO. 15) In this action, Plaintiff Andre 1. Clark asserts claims against his former employer, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and the Ford Motor Company General Retirement Plan (“the Plan”), under the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API