Legal Opinion

Harry McNamara v. The City of Rittman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2007No. 02-3965PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

This case involves a federal takings claim arising from the City of Rittman’s operation of water wells that allegedly caused damage to plaintiffs. In our initial review of the district court’s judgment, we requested that the Supreme Court of Ohio answer an important question of first impression involving a property owner’s interest in the groundwater beneath his property. The Supreme Court of Ohio has now answered that question. For the reasons articulated below, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

I

In 1973, the City of Rittman, Ohio,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Flores GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. River City Capital, L.P. v. Board of County Commissioners, Clermont County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Naiman Family Partners, L.P. v. SaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Asociacion de Sus v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API