Legal Opinion
Hensley v. City of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2009No. 07-4343PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their federal takings claim against the City of Columbus. They alleged that the City unconstitutionally deprived them of their well-water by digging a trench to extend a sewer pipeline. The district court dismissed their claim as barred by the statute of limitations. Because it ripened around 1992 — then beginning the two-year statute of limitations period — we affirm.
I
In 1990, the City of Columbus decided to extend a sewer line. To do so, the defendants (the City along with several private entities), created a dry…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Heard v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Wayside Church v. Van Buren CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Asociación de Suscripción Conjunta del Seguro de Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Juarbe-JiménezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Blanche Barber v. Charter Twp. of Springfield, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Terry Wilkins v. David DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Broom v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.