Legal Opinion

Zammit v. Shire US, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 16, 2006No. 05-70247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Pio Zammit, proceeding pro se, commenced this suit in this Court on .January 24, 2005, asserting product liability claims against Defendant Shire US, Inc., the manufacturer of the pharmaceutical products Adderall and Adderall XR. In support of these claims, Plaintiff alleges that he was prescribed and began taking Adderall in April of 2002, and that his use of this product led to a heart attack and heart damage on April 24, 2002. This Court’s subject matter jurisdiction rests upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. U.S. Structures, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. J.P. Structures, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, and Joseph J. PilatCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Julia Garcia v. Wyeth-Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Garden City Osteopathic Hospital v. HBE Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Lofton v. McNeil Consumer & Specialty PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Alli v. Eli Lilly and Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. White ex rel. Estate of McCullough v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. Bower v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API