Legal Opinion

Isquick v. Dale Adams Enterprise, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-7-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 2002No. C.A. No. 20839Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made: Appellant, Scott Isquick ("Isquick"), appeals from the decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, which entered judgment in favor of Appellees, Dale Adams and Dale Adams Enterprises, Inc. We affirm.

I

Isquick is a collector of antique automobiles. He contacted Dale Adams, who is in the business of restoring collector automobiles as Dale Adams Enterprises, Inc., to restore some of his automobiles. This appeal concerns the restoration of one of Isquick's…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API