Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia-Plascencia

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. 9301-30363; CA A86917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, arguing that his right to a speedy trial under both the Oregon and the United States Constitutions was impinged. We affirm.

On January 14, 1993, Officer Baldassare observed defendant drive up to and enter a house that was under surveillance. After defendant left the house and drove away, an informant inside the house reported that half a pound of cocaine had been delivered to the house. Police stopped defendant’s car and arrested both defendant and the passenger, Corona. During questioning, Corona stated that he did…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. WirthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RohlfingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. RussumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API