Legal Opinion

State v. Russum

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 2014No. 100431632; A147589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

In this case we consider whether defendant can be prosecuted after a jail official and a detective have opened mail to or from his attorney. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on four counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, assigning error to the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice. Defendant moved to dismiss after learning that a detective had inadvertently read part of a letter that defendant had sent to his attorney and finding that other letters to or from his attorney had been opened. Defendant argued below that the interference with confidential…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Johnson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Russum v. BowserDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API