Legal Opinion

Kauffman v. Deignan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1949No. 12143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This controversy involves the validity and construction of an instrument of assignment from W. R. Davis, Incorporated, a corporation, to Leo P. Deignan, as a mere nominee of and taking title for White, Weld & Company, a New York copartnership, dated January 6, 1941, and recorded in Volume 121, pages 15 — 18, of the Deed Récords of Starr County, Texas.

The assignment in question purports to convey an undivided one-fortieth (1/40) in an undivided one-half interest of all the right, title 'and interest now' owned and held by W. R. Davis, Incorporated, in and to the' oil, gas and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Grissom v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Stevens v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GXG, INC. v. Texacal Oil & Gas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  2. Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Hamilton v. Stekoll Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API