Legal Opinion

State v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

The appellant was convicted upon a bill of indictment charging that Earl Miller “... 2 cases of Camel cigarettes, 2 cases of Chesterfield cigarettes of the value of two hundred and five dollars aforesaid, of the goods, chattels and moneys of the said Jake Rendle-man before then feloniously stolen, taken and carried away, feloniously did receive and have . . . the said Earl Miller . . . then and there well knowing said goods, chattels and moneys to have been feloni-ously stolen, taken and carried away, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided.”

Tbe appellant assigns…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . StathosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. . FolgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. . SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API