Legal Opinion
State v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 30, 1970No. Civ. No. 69-1964-MPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE, AMEND, ETC.
PENCE, Chief Judge.
The motions before this court are but sequelae of this court’s decision and order of December 17, 1969, 49 F.R.D. 17, that this Sherman 1 antitrust case, filed as a class action by the State of Utah under Rule 23(b) (3), F.R.Civ.P., was not to be so maintained. As indicated in that prior ruling, Utah filed this Sherman 1 antitrust suit on May 13, 1969, just eleven days before the statute of limitations in these “Western Pipe” cases ceased to be tolled under Clayton 5(b) (15 U.S.C. § 16(b)). In those eleven days none of the moving…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yorden v. FlasteDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Stull v. BayardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Lucero ex rel. Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.