Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Campbell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 27 Neb., 644. cited, contending that the rule proposed by appellee was unconstitutional: Hubbard v. Callahan, 42 Conn., 524 [19 Am. Rep., 564]; Eaton v. ■ Boissonnault, 67 Me., 540 [24 Am. Rep., 52]; Cecilv. Hides, 29 Gratt. [Ya]., 1 [26 Am. Rep., 393]; Kellogg v. Lavender, 15 Neb., 260; CromweU v. County of Sac, 96 U. S., 51; Cooley on Con.

Read the full summary

Rehearing of case reported in 27 Neb., 644. cited, contending that the rule proposed by appellee was unconstitutional: Hubbard v. Callahan, 42 Conn., 524 [19 Am. Rep., 564]; Eaton v. ■ Boissonnault, 67 Me., 540 [24 Am. Rep., 52]; Cecilv. Hides, 29 Gratt. [Ya]., 1 [26 Am. Rep., 393]; Kellogg v. Lavender, 15 Neb., 260; CromweU v. County of Sac, 96 U. S., 51; Cooley on Con. Lim., 285; Lincoln B. & S. Ass’n v, Graham, ‘7 Neb., 179; Koenig v. O. & N. 72. Cb., 3 Id., 383; Brewer v. Otoe Co., 1 Id., 373. As to coupons: Matthews v. Toogood, 25 Neb., 102; Tiedeman on Com. Paper, sec. .477; Bell v.…

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This case was before this court in 1889, and is reported in 27 Neb., 644. A rehearing was granted upon the question of the rate of interest to which the plaintiff was entitled and the case is. again submitted to the’ court. It appears from the record that the original loan was for $600 due in five years. This loan was made February 29,1876, and at a rate of ten per cent per annum, with a provision that if not paid at maturity the note should draw interest at twelve per cent. This rate was lawful when the note in question was given. There were also five interest notes of sixty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conrad v. GibbonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Weyrich v. HobelmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Mathews v. ToogoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Richardson v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Havemeyer v. PaulNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Krutz v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hallam v. TellerenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API