Moody v. Maine Central Railroad
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Maine Central Railroad Company’s (“Maine Central”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Maine Central’s motion is in response to an action brought against it by Plaintiff Donald Moody under the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. 51, et seq., alleging that the Plaintiff suffered injuries as a result of the negligent acts and omissions of the Defendant. The Court finds no genuine issue of material fact with respect to these claims and, therefore, grants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sullivan v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Dickerson v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Finn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donald Moody v. Maine Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Robert A. Holliday v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Halko v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Amendola v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
- Masiello v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.