Amendola v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R. Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Plaintiffs have filed briefs in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
This action arises under the Federal Employers’ Liability…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Thomas v. FAG Bearings Corp., Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
- Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.