Legal Opinion

Amendola v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 14, 1988No. 88-0395-CV-W-3PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R. Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Plaintiffs have filed briefs in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

This action arises under the Federal Employers’ Liability…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Thomas v. FAG Bearings Corp., Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  5. Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API