Legal Opinion
Halko v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 7, 1987No. 84 Civ. 6300 (CHT)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Halko has brought this action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1982), alleging that Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) and New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (“NJT”) were negligent in failing to properly hire, train and supervise its management which contributed to the death of Edward Halko (“Halko”), the plaintiff's decedent. Plaintiff’s complaint states two counts of injury. The first claim seeks compensation for a physical injury to Halko’s ankle and is only against Conrail. The second…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Patton v. BickfordKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Kivland v. Columbia Orthopaedic Group, LLPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Clift v. Narragansett Television L.P.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Ronald Coppinger v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.