Legal Opinion

Application of Oliver C. Eckel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 16, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 30, 31 and 32 of appellant’s application 1 for a patent for “Assembly of Acoustical Panels with Retainers.” Two claims were allowed.

Claim 30, which is representative, reads:

30. An assembly in combination with two angularly adjoining walls, said assembly comprising a plurality of panels extending along said two adjoining walls adjacent the junction thereof and spaced apart, a corner standard positioned at the corner between said two angularly adjoining walls and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of John E. BorahCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Application of Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Application of Jesse T. Dunn and Alex E. Brodhag, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of Jesse T. Dunn and Alex E. Brodhag, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API