Application of John E. Borah
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-4 and 11-13 of application serial No. 11,533, filed February 29, 1960, for “Molding Apparatus.”
The sole ground of rejection before us is double patenting. The examiner made additional rejections on prior art but the board reversed them. The board also reversed the double patenting rejection of claims 6, 8, 9, and 10, which stand allowed. The reference relied on to support the double patenting rejection is appellant’s own patent:
Borah 2,983,953 May 16, 1961.
Double patenting…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- General Foods Corporation v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle MbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- In re BergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- In Re Josephus J.M. BraatCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.