Legal Opinion

Clark v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1948No. 4-8632PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddiN, Justice.

This appeal presents problems arising from the alleged parol rescission of a written contract.

In December, 1945, Clark leased certain lands to Duncan for the calendar years of 1946, 1947 and 1948. The contract was in writing, and a rent note was executed for each year. Duncan cultivated the lands in 1946 and paid the rent for that year; but did neither in 1947. Thereupon Clark filed this action on the 1947 rent note. Duncan’s defense was that he and Clark had by parol mutual consent rescinded the written rent contract, and that such rescission was effective at the end…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Prairie Development Co. v. LeibergIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Willard F. Deputy & Co v. HastingsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation v. Fred Thompson, D/B/A Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  2. Stephens v. West Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Davis v. SelfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Compton v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Long v. LamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API