Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Ashabranner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1949No. 4-8353PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.

Appellee, R. A. Ashabranner, a real estate broker in Hot Springs, filed action against appellant, C. C. Reynolds, and Ms wife, Mrs. Cornelia Ney Reynolds, for $1,750 claimed by appellee to be due Mm as the earned commission under a real estate broker’s contract. Mr. and Mrs. Reynolds owned, by estate of entirety, a tourist court near Hot Springs. An agent of Ashabranner approached Mr. Reynolds to list the property for sale, at a price of $35,000, and Reynolds signed a contract reading as follows:

“January 25, 1946.
“For and in consideration of the services rendered and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Temple Cotton Oil Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. American Insurance v. HaynieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. American Sales Book Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Branch v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. LylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Universal C. I. T. Credit Co. v. RoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Pineview Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Bill C. Harris Construction Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Hopper v. DenhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API