Legal Opinion

Willard F. Deputy & Co v. Hastings

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 12, 1923No. 19PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

charging the jury:

This action is brought by the plaintiff, Willard F. Deputy & Co., against the defendant, E. Guy Hastings, administrator of William Ward, Joseph Ward, Thomas Ward and Daniel B. Recates to recover damages, occasioned by the breach of a written and sealed contract alleged to have been entered into between the parties.

There is no dispute over the fact that a written and sealed instrument was prepared and executed by the plaintiff and by William Ward, Joseph Ward, Thomas Ward and Daniel B. Recates.

' This contract is in general for the sale of the timber on a tract of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Bean v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
  3. Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Naylor v. SteneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Whitaker v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stabler v. RamsaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. USH Ventures v. Global Telesystems Group, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Stabler v. RamsayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API