Legal Opinion

Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation v. Fred Thompson, D/B/A Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 24, 1959No. 16299PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Circuit Judge,

Plaintiff Dunlop Tire and Rubber CorPorati°n, of New York, instituted this suit to recover $6,467.61, the balance due, including interest, for tires sold to defendants, citi2;ens of Arkansas. The correctness of plaintiff’s account is not in dispute; the issue litigated was whether defendants were entitled to an offset in the sum of $6,392.58 for adjustments claimed to have been made by them with their customers on defective tires. Plaintiff unsuccessfully moved the court for a directed verdict for the full amount sued for. The issue was submitted to the jury which found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Elkins v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Lemm v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Jeter v. WindleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. General Electric Company v. United States Dynamics, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  5. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Company of Iowa v. Fox Turkey Farms, Inc., Fox Turkey Farms, Inc. v. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Company of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API